Gunther Mayer wrote:
> On another note, autovacuum couldn't cause such issues, could it? I do
> have autovacuum enabled (autovacuum=on as well as
> stats_start_collector=on, stats_block_level = on and stats_row_level =
> on), is there any possibility that autovacuum is not as resource
> friendly as advertised?
Hmm. I am not sure where did you read that but I don't think it has
ever been stated that autovacuum is resource friendly in the default
configuration (I, for one, have never tried, intended or wanted to state
that). I suggest tuning the autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay parameters if
you want it to interfere less with your regular operation.
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Y Sidhu||Date: 2007-06-07 16:47:52|
|Subject: How Are The Variables Related?|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Sullivan||Date: 2007-06-07 15:45:50|
|Subject: Re: VERY slow queries at random|