| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gunther Mayer <gunther(dot)mayer(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: VERY slow queries at random |
| Date: | 2007-06-07 15:58:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20070607155812.GN3664@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Gunther Mayer wrote:
> On another note, autovacuum couldn't cause such issues, could it? I do
> have autovacuum enabled (autovacuum=on as well as
> stats_start_collector=on, stats_block_level = on and stats_row_level =
> on), is there any possibility that autovacuum is not as resource
> friendly as advertised?
Hmm. I am not sure where did you read that but I don't think it has
ever been stated that autovacuum is resource friendly in the default
configuration (I, for one, have never tried, intended or wanted to state
that). I suggest tuning the autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay parameters if
you want it to interfere less with your regular operation.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Y Sidhu | 2007-06-07 16:47:52 | How Are The Variables Related? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-07 15:45:50 | Re: VERY slow queries at random |