Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement
Date: 2007-06-01 21:11:36
Message-ID: 200706012111.l51LBac04678@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think it should be dropped entirely. The argument against was that
> >> it complicated the code in a non-performance-critical path, and that
> >> argument isn't going to be different next time.
>
> > I only kept it for 8.4 because I was worried it might be needed for HOT
> > performance.
>
> No such argument has been made in my hearing, and I can't imagine why
> either of the functions touched by the patch would be more
> performance-critical for HOT than they are today.

OK, removed from 8.4 queue.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-01 22:54:04 Re: [HACKERS] like/ilike improvements
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-01 21:10:04 Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement