| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | novnov <novnovice(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored? | 
| Date: | 2007-05-30 18:53:03 | 
| Message-ID: | 20070530185303.GK7128@alvh.no-ip.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
novnov escribió:
> 
> While a hard coded order by clause works; passing the order by as a param is
> ignored as I've implemented below.  The order by value is being passed as
> expected (tested by outputing the value in a column).
It doesn't because the value is expanded as a constant, therefore all
rows have the same value and the sort is a no-op.  Try using EXECUTE
(although I admit I don't know if you are able to do an OPEN CURSOR with
EXECUTE)
-- 
Alvaro Herrera                 http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4
Bob [Floyd] used to say that he was planning to get a Ph.D. by the "green
stamp method," namely by saving envelopes addressed to him as 'Dr. Floyd'.
After collecting 500 such letters, he mused, a university somewhere in
Arizona would probably grant him a degree.              (Don Knuth)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-05-30 18:55:49 | Re: Uhm, so, yeah, speaking of /. | 
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-05-30 18:47:39 | Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored? |