* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Yeah, I wouldn't want one per second.
> It's not one per second, it's after one second (actually
> deadlock_timeout) has elapsed since you started to sleep waiting for a
> lock. If a deadlock is not detected the process won't be awakened
Ah, I see.. Actually, if it's just one NOTICE after one second, I think
that'd be fine. Sorry, misunderstood what was going on.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Enrico Sirola||Date: 2007-05-30 16:55:29|
|Subject: table partitioning pl/pgsql helpers|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-05-30 16:43:58|
|Subject: Re: TOAST usage setting|