Re: TOAST usage setting

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: TOAST usage setting
Date: 2007-05-29 16:11:01
Message-ID: 200705291611.l4TGB1N07298@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > >> > Strangely, 128 bytes seems to be the break-even point for TOAST and
> > > >> > non-TOAST, even for sequential scans of the entire heap touching all
> > > >> > long row values. I am somewhat confused why TOAST has faster access
> > > >> > than inline heap data.
> > >
> > > Is your database initialized with C locale? If so then length(text) is
> > > optimized to not have to detoast:
> > >
> > > if (pg_database_encoding_max_length() == 1)
> > > PG_RETURN_INT32(toast_raw_datum_size(str) - VARHDRSZ);
> >
> > Wow, we optimized length(). OK, will run the test with
> > substring(t,1,1).
>
> Be careful about the compression! It might be a good idea to run the
> test once with the column set to uncompressible (SET STORAGE EXTERNAL?),
> and again with it as compressible.

My test uses random data, which I figured was a close to real-world as I
could get, and I have a test that makes sure the data was pushed to the
TOAST table. Should I still try EXTERNAL?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-05-29 16:12:46 Re: TOAST usage setting
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-05-29 16:09:16 Re: TOAST usage setting