Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Concurrent psql patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,"Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date: 2007-05-21 14:21:33
Message-ID: 200705211621.34078.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 15:21 schrieb Gregory Stark:
> Also, I forgot to mention previously there is an unrelated trivial hunk in
> here. I noticed we free the password early, presumably for security
> reasons,

No, to save memory.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2007-05-21 14:59:28
Subject: Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member vaquita Branch HEAD Status changed from ECPG-Check failure to OK]
Previous:From: Shachar ShemeshDate: 2007-05-21 14:02:49
Subject: Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2007-05-21 14:58:29
Subject: Re: Patch needed fot dt.h
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-05-21 14:17:30
Subject: Re: Patch needed fot dt.h

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group