Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch needed fot dt.h

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>,Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch needed fot dt.h
Date: 2007-05-21 14:58:29
Message-ID: 20070521145829.GA9126@feivel.credativ.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:17:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm wondering why the back-branch patches added a dependency on
> DTK_ISODOW in the first place.  That looks more like a copy&paste
> error than something intentional.  Michael?

It is, somehow it slipped through. Just removed it.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2007-05-21 15:24:21
Subject: Re: Synchronized Scan
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-05-21 14:21:33
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group