| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch needed fot dt.h |
| Date: | 2007-05-21 14:58:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20070521145829.GA9126@feivel.credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:17:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm wondering why the back-branch patches added a dependency on
> DTK_ISODOW in the first place. That looks more like a copy&paste
> error than something intentional. Michael?
It is, somehow it slipped through. Just removed it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-05-21 15:24:21 | Re: Synchronized Scan |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-05-21 14:21:33 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |