Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: m32r tas() implementation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Martin Pitt <martin(at)piware(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kazuhiro Inaoka <inaoka(dot)kazuhiro(at)renesas(dot)com>
Subject: Re: m32r tas() implementation
Date: 2007-04-27 01:21:30
Message-ID: 200704270121.l3R1LUO24700@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Martin Pitt wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi PostgreSQL developers,
> 
> Kazuhiro Inaoka recently sent me a tas() implementation for the m32r
> architecture [1]. It applies cleanly to 8.2.3 and seems otherwise
> harmless. Do you consider applying it upstream?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Martin
> 
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M32R
> 
> -- 
> Martin Pitt        http://www.piware.de
> Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
> Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-05-04 15:26:28
Subject: Re: m32r tas() implementation
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-04-24 05:27:52
Subject: Re: m32r tas() implementation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group