Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Wild idea: 9.0?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Wild idea: 9.0?
Date: 2007-04-23 22:20:08
Message-ID: 200704240020.09161.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Just wondering: does this have any implications about a possible end
> of life of the 7.x branch?

Not that there is a "7.x branch", but: No.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-04-23 22:26:47
Subject: Re: Improving deadlock error messages
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-04-23 22:18:18
Subject: Re: Better error message for select_common_type()

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2007-04-23 22:46:48
Subject: Re: cost per transaction
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-04-23 22:17:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group