| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Date: | 2007-04-24 01:15:38 |
| Message-ID: | 200704232115.38853.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 23 April 2007 18:17, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme. 8.2 to
> 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts. See
> http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-04-24 03:17:28 | Re: cost per transaction |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-04-23 22:46:48 | Re: cost per transaction |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-24 02:42:38 | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k o b j ect |
| Previous Message | Koichi Suzuki | 2007-04-24 01:15:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update |