Re: Wild idea: 9.0?

From: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Wild idea: 9.0?
Date: 2007-04-23 20:22:34
Message-ID: 200704231622.34256.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

My five cents...

On Monday 23 April 2007 15:24, Josh Berkus wrote:
> ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?

This sounds a lot like the talk some of the guys had at OSCON discussing the version number issue just before 8.0 was released that fall.

Offhand I would agree with a 9.0 version number if the upcoming changes are of equal significance of 8.0 from it's earlier version.

Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2007-04-23 21:53:08 Re: Wild idea: 9.0?
Previous Message August Zajonc 2007-04-23 20:16:14 Re: Wild idea: 9.0?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-23 20:28:47 Inefficiency in FK triggers
Previous Message August Zajonc 2007-04-23 20:16:14 Re: Wild idea: 9.0?