Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Subject: Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?
Date: 2007-04-23 21:23:29
Message-ID: 200704231423.29895.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil,

> This works, but it seems overly verbose. It occurred to me that we could
> easily add a new PL/PgSQL statement that evaluates a set-returning
> expression and adds *all* the resulting rows to the function's result
> set. For example:
>
> RETURN QUERY SELECT ...;
>
> I'm not sure of the right name: "RETURN ROWS" or "RETURN ALL" might also
> work. Of course, this is syntax sugar (and superficial sugar at that),
> but I believe this is a fairly common requirement.
>
> Comments?

Hmmm ... "ALL" is already a reserved word, so is unlikely to be a variable
name, yes? I'd think we could get some breakage on "ROWS". So I'd go for
"RETURN ALL".

Overall, I think this is worthwhile, but maybe not enough to bypass feature
freeze.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-23 21:26:48 Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k o b j ect
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-04-23 21:22:04 Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k o b j ect