Tom Lane wrote:
> Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The entire *point* of that paragraph is that we don't have the
> >> feature. This proposed change is surely not an improvement...
> > Maybe removing the entire example would be more helpful. I don't find
> > it clear to have a command outline in a compatibility block.
> True, there doesn't seem to be any point in providing a full syntax
> summary rather than just saying "the SQL spec says you can grant
> privileges on columns but we don't support that yet".
Agreed. Patch attached and applied. I don't see any other cases of
this in our documentation.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Description: text/x-diff (2.5 KB)
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2007-04-08 19:34:53|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix misleading references to columns in GRANT/REVOKE summaries|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-04-07 02:24:57|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix misleading references to columns in GRANT/REVOKE summaries |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-04-07 04:19:28|
|Subject: Re: UTF8MatchText|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-04-07 03:39:40|
|Subject: Re: HOT Patch - Ready for review|