On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:19:04PM -0400, Ron wrote:
>Both statements are the literal truth.
Repeating something over and over again doesn't make it truth. The OP
asked for statistical evidence (presumably real-world field evidence) to
support that assertion. Thus far, all the publicly available evidence
does not show a significant difference between SATA and SCSI reliability
in the field.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Michael Stone||Date: 2007-04-06 11:43:38|
|Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-04-06 06:38:31|
|Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA |