Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Date: 2007-04-03 02:17:15
Message-ID: 200704030217.l332HFm25104@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Fixed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Add idle_timeout GUC so locks are not held for log periods of time
> >
> >
> >
>
> ITYM long periods.
>
>
> cheers
>
>
> andrew

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-03 02:17:19 Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-04-03 02:05:50 Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout