Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Date: 2007-04-03 02:17:15
Message-ID: 200704030217.l332HFm25104@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Fixed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > 	* Add idle_timeout GUC so locks are not held for log periods of time
> >
> >   
> >
> 
> ITYM long periods.
> 
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> andrew

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-04-03 02:17:19
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-04-03 02:05:50
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group