On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:08:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > After several rounds of patches, it appears that it might be easier to
> > create a new typtype entry, which I'll tentatively call 'a' because it
> > seems a little fragile and a lot inelegant and hard to maintain to
> > have typtype='c' and typrelid=InvalidOid mean, "this is an array of
> > complex types."
> Uh, wouldn't it be typtype = 'c' and typelem != 0 ?
Right. The attached patch passes the current regression tests and at
least to a "smoke test" level does what it's supposed to do. I'd
really like to help refactor the whole array system to use 'a', tho.
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-04-02 20:11:35|
|Subject: Re: Questions about pid file creation code |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-04-02 19:57:40|
|Subject: Re: So are we calling it: Feature Freeze?|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-04-02 20:13:23|
|Subject: Re: Concurrent psql v4 [WIP]|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-04-02 20:01:44|
|Subject: Re: [Fwd: Deferred Transactions, Transaction
Guarantee and COMMITwithout waiting]|