Re: Current enums patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
Subject: Re: Current enums patch
Date: 2007-04-01 02:12:45
Message-ID: 20070401021245.GA20303@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

> Unless someone objects, I'll change this and also revert to the
> enumlabel name that seems to have been used originally (it was still
> used in the docs). It seems more readable somehow (I guess it's the
> lack of either ascenders or descenders in "enumname").

Wow, I wasn't aware we were picking our terms based on typography. It
is kind of cool.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-04-01 02:20:55 Add usage counts to pg_buffercache
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-04-01 01:30:34 pgbench transaction timestamps