Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Current enums patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
Subject: Re: Current enums patch
Date: 2007-04-01 02:12:45
Message-ID: 20070401021245.GA20303@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:

> Unless someone objects, I'll change this and also revert to the
> enumlabel name that seems to have been used originally (it was still
> used in the docs).  It seems more readable somehow (I guess it's the
> lack of either ascenders or descenders in "enumname").

Wow, I wasn't aware we were picking our terms based on typography.  It
is kind of cool.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-04-01 02:20:55
Subject: Add usage counts to pg_buffercache
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-04-01 01:30:34
Subject: pgbench transaction timestamps

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group