Marko Kreen escribió:
> On 3/30/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >In any case it's not likely that there are going to be thousands of
> >prepared statements, so is this really an issue?
> I think the issue is here that its very common thing to do,
> so open-coding it everywhere is waste, there should be some
> utility function for that.
> void hash_foreach(HTAB, void (*cb_func)(void *));
Extra points if you can implement a map() function for hashes ;-) (I
think it's called "mutator" in our sources for other kind of stuff)
I think it would be
void *hash_map(HTAB, void *(*map_func) (void *))
Not sure what the return value would be though :-( (Maybe this is
extra complication enough that it's not worth the hassle)
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Teodor Sigaev||Date: 2007-03-30 16:05:17|
|Subject: index support is NULL|
|Previous:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2007-03-30 14:00:29|
|Subject: Re: DEALLOCATE ALL|