Gregory Stark wrote:
> >> Did Greg push a version which didn't carry the "WIP" label to it? As
> >> far as I remember he was still asking how to make the Sort and Limit
> >> nodes communicate.
> > Good question. I asked for a new version of this patch and the WIP was
> > only in the email subject line. Greg, is this ready for review?
> Well my question was whether it was acceptable to do things this way or
> whether there was a better way. If it's the right way then sure, if not then
> no. I guess that's what review is for.
> In short I'm not sure what constitutes "ready for review". Are you asking if
> it's ready to apply? I don't know, that's why we have reviews. Or are you
> asking if it's ready for someone to look at? What's the point of posting WIP
> patches if you don't want someone to look at it?
I am asking if _you_ are done working on it. Seems you are, so I will
add it to the patch queue.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-03-25 01:44:19|
|Subject: Re: Automatic adjustment of bgwriter_lru_maxpages|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-03-24 21:50:03|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3095: LDAP authentication parsing incorrectly|