Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support
Date: 2007-03-22 20:55:24
Message-ID: 200703222155.25293.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Would it be better to use some more unlikely name for the dummy root
> element used to process fragments than <x> ?

Why do we even need to support xpath on fragments?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-03-22 20:58:36 Re: xpath_array with namespaces support
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-22 20:54:57 Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-22 20:58:09 Re: guc patch: Make variables fall back to default values
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-03-22 20:54:42 Re: xpath_array with namespaces support