| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
| Date: | 2007-03-08 18:54:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20070308185457.GW24979@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
One other thought... a lot of this discussion seems to parallel the
debate from a while ago about whether SERIAL should act like a macro
(ie: it just sets everything up and users are free to monkey under the
hood afterwards), or whether it should be it's own 'closed-box'
construct.
Currently, we seem to be leaning towards partition management being a
'macro', with child tables very exposed, etc. I don't know if that's
good or bad, but it's probably worth some thought.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikita | 2007-03-08 19:05:46 | Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-03-08 18:51:19 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug Knight | 2007-03-08 19:33:46 | Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-03-08 18:51:19 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |