Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
Date: 2007-03-02 18:52:17
Message-ID: 200703021852.l22IqHo06607@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
> > non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
> > 
> >     <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license.  By posting a patch
> >     to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL
> >     Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your
> >     patch under the BSD license.  If you use code that is available under
> >     a BSD-compatible license (eg. public domain), please note that in your
> >     email submission.  If the license is not BSD-compatible (e.g. GPL),
> >     please do not post the patch.</li>
> 
> How about something simpler:
> 
> <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. Patches that are
> submitted another a non-compatible license (such as the GPL) will be
> ignored.</li>

No, I don't people even seeing GPL patches on our lists.  There is too
much of a chance of accident, and possible problems if we re-implemented
with a BSD license.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-03-02 18:55:01
Subject: Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-03-02 18:52:14
Subject: WITH/RECURSIVE plans

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group