"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > VACUUM's current behaviour is to take blocks it has touched and place
> > > them on the head of the freelist, allowing them to be reused.
> > No, it puts them at the tail of the freelist.
> That's a minor point because the freelist is mostly empty, so head ==
> tail in 99.9% of cases.
That's correct. Also, even if a VACUUM process collects some unused buffers
into the freelist, other backends comsume all of them in a moment.
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-03-01 02:06:15|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?|
|Previous:||From: Takayuki Tsunakawa||Date: 2007-03-01 00:45:53|
|Subject: Re: Dead Space Map version 2|