On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:17:44AM -0800, Chris Marcellino wrote:
> So I've finished reformulating this patch to use the device/inode
> instead of the hash idea I had earlier.
> I have tested this patch (on Darwin) to permit the postmaster to
> recover after a crash or killing, and it will not permit the
> postmaster to restart while another postmaster or backends are still
> in the database (regardless of the lockfile status). The ideas are
> the same as before, but are described via flowchart in the attached
The PDF didn't come through. Could you please re-send?
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-02-28 17:28:33|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] |
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-02-28 16:00:30|
|Subject: Re: I want to omit the fopen message of Windows.|