Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> >> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> >> comments.
> > The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with
> > Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use
> > this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar
> > interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".
> You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have
> bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only
> warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it.
> If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: postgres||Date: 2007-02-27 22:55:19|
|Subject: BUG #3085: Performance BUG|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-02-27 19:08:38|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Chris Marcellino||Date: 2007-02-27 19:17:44|
|Subject: POSIX Shared memory, revised, again|
|Previous:||From: Pavan Deolasee||Date: 2007-02-27 18:23:47|
|Subject: Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 3.2|