| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Hammond <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
| Date: | 2007-02-21 08:53:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20070221085343.GB19713@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:22:30PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Hammond wrote:
> > I know it's mentioned in the FAQ, but I'd like to have a separate page
> > that describes what a minor release is, and why it's a good idea to
> > keep up with them. Basically, I want something simple and clear to
> > point middle-managers at when they ask me why I want to upgrade the
> > database.
> >
> > I'm willing to write it, if there's a consensus that it would be worth
> > having.
>
> I think adding to the FAQ is the best solution. What additional
> information to we need there?
I think it's important enough (and unclear enough to a lot of people)
that it shuold have it's own non-FAQ section. Either as a page on the
website or as a page in the documentation.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-21 14:30:47 | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-21 01:22:30 | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-21 14:30:47 | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-21 03:47:40 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Deployment Case Study Presentations |