Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Here is a patch further cleaning up dummy process startup and the
> >bootstrap code itself a little.
> Could we please call the "dummy" processes something else? Dummy
> seems a bit belittling for such important things like bgwriter and the
> startup process.
> How about worker or helper process?
Well, sure, but the name was there before I patched it :-) This is
mostly a code issue though, not something that shows up at all at the
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2007-02-19 13:48:06|
|Subject: Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements|
|Previous:||From: Joachim Wieland||Date: 2007-02-19 13:07:48|
|Subject: guc patch: Make variables fall back to default values|