Re: BUG #2977: dow doesn't conform to ISO-8601

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Adriaan van Os" <postgres(at)microbizz(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: BUG #2977: dow doesn't conform to ISO-8601
Date: 2007-02-07 10:57:21
Message-ID: 200702071157.22498.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 11:24 schrieb Adriaan van Os:
> Section 9.9.1 of the Postgres docs
> <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/functions-datetime.html>
> mentions that the "week" subfield of the date_part function conforms to the
> ISO-8601 standard.

I see no such claim there.

> You can not, in the same function, ignore ISO-8601 for one subfield and
> follow it in another.

I think we have pretty well shown that we can.

> Besides, if in the same week Sunday comes before Monday, how can the result
> of the "week" and "dow" fields conform to each other ?

They don't.

> If "dow" can not be changed for reasons of backward compatibility, I
> suggest a new subfield "dayofweek" that does conform to the standard.

That might be reasonable. (Or maybe "isodow".)

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roman Grigorovich 2007-02-07 11:42:37 BUG #2979: Functional indexes ERROR while updating table
Previous Message Adriaan van Os 2007-02-07 10:24:49 BUG #2977: dow doesn't conform to ISO-8601

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-07 12:41:41 Re: [PATCHES] Fix "database is ready" race condition
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-02-07 10:49:17 LIMIT/SORT optimization