Heikki, did this code cleanup get included in your recent btree split
fix?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > In that case, newitemleft would be false, right?
> > I'm saying the piece marked with X> below is unreachable:
> 
> Oh, I see.  Hmm ... probably so, I think that chunk of code was just
> copied and pasted from where it occurs within the loop.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

• Re: Dead code in _bt_split? at 2006-12-07 23:49:46 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Dead code in _bt_split? at 2007-02-04 09:37:26 from Heikki Linnakangas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jan Wieck	Date: 2007-02-04 01:02:26
	Subject: Re: Proposal: Change of pg_trigger.tg_enabled and adding
Previous:	From: Jeremy Drake	Date: 2007-02-03 23:51:38
	Subject: SRF optimization question

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-02-04 00:00:01
	Subject: Re: Index split WAL reduction
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-02-03 23:46:56
	Subject: Re: date comparisons