Tom Lane wrote:
> < errmsg("aggregate function calls cannot be nested")));
> > errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));
> I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English.
> You have changed a message that states that an action is logically
> impossible into one that implies we are arbitrarily refusing to let
> the user do something that *could* be done, if only we'd let him.
> There is relevant material in the message style guidelines, section
> 45.3.8: it says that "cannot open file "%s" ... indicates that the
> functionality of opening the named file does not exist at all in the
> program, or that it's conceptually impossible."
Uh, I think you might be reading the diff backwards. The current CVS
wording is "cannot".
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-02-01 20:52:58|
|Subject: Re: The may/can/might business|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-02-01 20:19:34|
|Subject: The may/can/might business|