Where are we on this?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> > 
> > > > > > MinGW has fseeko64 and ftello64 with off64_t.
> > > > > >   
> > > > > 
> > > > > Maybe we need separate macros for MSVC and MinGW. Given the other 
> > > > 
> > > > You mean something quick and dirty like this ? That would work.
> > > 
> > > Yes, except does that actually work? If so you found the place in the
> > > headers to stick it without breaking things that I couldn't find ;-)
> > 
> > Compiles clean without warnings on MinGW, but not tested, sorry also no
> > time.
> 
> Does not compile on my MinGW - errors in the system headers (unistd.h,
> io.h) due to changing the argument format for chsize(). The change of
> off_t propagated into parts of the system headers, thus chaos was
> ensured.
> 
> I still think we need to use a pgoff_t. Will look at combining these two
> approaches.
> 
> //Magnus
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

• Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file at 2006-12-29 16:30:48 from Magnus Hagander

Responses

• Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file at 2007-02-01 11:27:05 from Magnus Hagander

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-02-01 04:52:30
	Subject: Re: Security leak with trigger functions?
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-02-01 04:36:15
	Subject: Re: FOR SHARE vs FOR UPDATE locks