Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Lock compatibility matrix

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Date: 2007-01-30 10:09:01
Message-ID: 200701301109.02982.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> I had this in a different form, but reworked so that it matches the
> doc patch that Teodor submitted earlier. I think it would be good to
> have this information in the lock.h file as well.

Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same information?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Guido GoldsteinDate: 2007-01-30 10:43:52
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix for plpython functions; return true/false for boolean,
Previous:From: Pavan DeolaseeDate: 2007-01-30 09:52:32
Subject: Lock compatibility matrix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group