Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date: 2007-01-28 22:02:24
Message-ID: 200701282202.l0SM2OH24805@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-patches pgsql-sql

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I don't like that because it parenthesizes the most important part of
> > the message, which is a style-guideline violation at least in spirit.
> > How about
> >
> > ... terminated by signal 10: Bus error
>
> I like that.

OK, but you guys added back that colon you didn't like. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-01-28 23:36:11 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-28 17:21:50 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-01-28 22:06:10 Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)
Previous Message Richard Troy 2007-01-28 20:44:46 Re: DROP FUNCTION failure: cache lookup failed for relation

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-01-28 23:36:11 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-28 17:21:50 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal