Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date: 2007-01-28 02:33:32
Message-ID: 200701280233.l0S2XWn04496@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-patchespgsql-sql
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> Good idea.  I only have sys_siglist[] on BSD/OS, and Linux and FreeBSD
> >> have that too, so I only used that.  We will now print both signal
> >> descriptions and numbers for backend error exits, and descriptions only
> >> for pclose() because we only have a three-argument function to log.
> >> Attached and applied.
> 
> This patch has broken much of the buildfarm.

I think it is because I didn't have #include <signal.h> in exec.c.  Added.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-28 05:24:23
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-28 02:24:37
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-01-28 04:07:07
Subject: Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-28 02:24:37
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-28 05:24:23
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-28 02:24:37
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group