Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-25 17:13:54
Message-ID: 200701251813.56041.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> So.. do we agree for uuid to be included in the core?

I suggest that you read the discussion in the tsearch thread about 
figuring out how to make contrib modules more attractive.  I don't see 
a reason why uuid has to be in the core, but I do see that there needs 
to be some centrally organized consolidation of the various existing 
attempts under a label of officiality.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-01-25 17:27:04
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-01-25 17:06:48
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group