| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: guid/uuid datatype |
| Date: | 2007-01-25 17:13:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200701251813.56041.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> So.. do we agree for uuid to be included in the core?
I suggest that you read the discussion in the tsearch thread about
figuring out how to make contrib modules more attractive. I don't see
a reason why uuid has to be in the core, but I do see that there needs
to be some centrally organized consolidation of the various existing
attempts under a label of officiality.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-25 17:27:04 | Re: guid/uuid datatype |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-25 17:06:48 | Re: guid/uuid datatype |