| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Meredith L(dot) Patterson" <mlp(at)thesmartpolitenerd(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Questions for Meredith |
| Date: | 2007-01-22 00:11:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200701211611.24282.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | sfpug |
Meredith,
> On one hand, it would be terribly nice to find a one-size-fits-all
> solution, but I doubt that if you put five DBAs in a room you could get
> them all to agree on what constitutes a sufficiently secure sublanguage.
I don't think we should try to fly while we're still toddling. I'd rather see
us work out the minimal things necessary to make Dejector immediately usable
in the field, and then start developing more sophisticated APIs based on
real-world feedback. Heck, some of the users will develop the APIs for you.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-01-22 23:32:32 | Schedule for February meeting TBA |
| Previous Message | Meredith L. Patterson | 2007-01-20 16:32:18 | Re: Questions for Meredith |