From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: possible copyright infringement against |
Date: | 2007-01-20 20:59:15 |
Message-ID: | 200701202059.l0KKxFv19954@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2007 15:40, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Robert Bernier wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 January 2007 15:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The BSD license allows this.
> > >
> > > I'm not talking about source code: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement
> >
> > I assume our documentation and all our postings are BSD-licensed too.
>
> Ah, I understand where you're going. Not necesarily, I'm refering to
> articles that have been posted on websites for profit. The website I
> speak of datamines as many copyrighted articles it can find off the
> internet and not just reference documentation. Dru's articles, for
> instance, have definitely not been BSD licensed and O'Reilly certaintly
> doesn't do that i.e. somebody is making money from other people's work.
>
> It's like I printed a few thousand copies of your PostgreSQL book (is
> it BSD licensed?) and kept the profits for myself without giving you
> any royalties?
True, but this isn't a community issue because the community resources
are BSD licensed.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2007-01-20 21:09:56 | Re: possible copyright infringement against postgresql writers, bloggers, and advocates |
Previous Message | Robert Bernier | 2007-01-20 20:52:50 | Re: possible copyright infringement against postgresql writers, bloggers, and advocates |