Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-20 03:33:11
Message-ID: 200701200333.l0K3XBQ25274@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I should have been clearer.  I think having in the main server or
> > /contrib makes sense.  Having data types external to our source tree
> > doesn't seem to work too well because of changes in our API from time
> > to time.
> 
> When has the API for data types ever changed?

The API doesn't change, but the way to do things inside the type
functions does changes sometimes.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-20 04:00:57
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-20 03:24:39
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group