Tom Lane wrote:
> Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hm, that's an interesting point.  psql's -c just shoves its whole
> >> argument string at the backend in one PQexec(), instead of dividing
> >> at semicolons as psql does with normal input.
> 
> > Is there a good reason to not let psql -c behave exactly like psql from 
> > STDIN?
> 
> Backwards compatibility, mostly --- there seems to be a considerable
> risk of subtly breaking people's scripts if we change the transactional
> boundaries for psql -c commands.

True, but if we keep hitting people who don't expect this behavior, I
wonder if we should just fix it and mention it in the release notes.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

• Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question at 2007-01-04 16:44:36 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question at 2007-01-05 03:38:18 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: markwkm	Date: 2007-01-05 03:25:41
	Subject: Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Previous:	From: Gavin Sherry	Date: 2007-01-05 02:44:56
	Subject: Re: ideas for auto-processing patches