| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Date: | 2007-01-02 19:21:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20070102192138.GF24675@kenobi.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* David Boreham (david_list(at)boreham(dot)org) wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> >I suspect most postgres developers and companies would like to keep
> >things as BSDish as possible.
>
> Right, hence OpenSSL would be the obvious best choice.
> In respect of licencing however, NSS is no 'worse' than GNU TLS
> because it may be distributed under the GPL and LGPL.
And the MPL, which at least according to the Mozilla FAQ falls somewhere
between the GPL and BSD (though I'm not sure I'd agree...).
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Boreham | 2007-01-02 19:25:34 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-01-02 19:18:23 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |