Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside
From:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To:
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc:
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject:
Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside
Date:
2007-01-02 10:53:17
Message-ID:
200701021153.18689.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2006-12-28 17:38:56 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2006-12-28 17:57:25 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2006-12-28 18:10:05 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2006-12-28 18:52:26 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2006-12-28 19:02:16 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2006-12-28 20:44:07 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2006-12-29 04:24:28 from Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
2006-12-29 04:39:37 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2007-01-02 10:50:41 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2007-01-02 10:53:17 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2007-01-02 15:00:24 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2007-01-02 16:34:05 from "news(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
2007-01-02 16:42:36 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2007-01-02 16:48:15 from Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
2007-01-02 17:33:25 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2007-01-02 19:01:57 from Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
2007-01-03 15:40:38 from Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
2007-01-04 01:42:20 from "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-01-02 17:26:05 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2007-01-02 18:04:46 from "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 18:57 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> I think you can make the case that this should be an error, or at least
> that's how it got on the TODO list. I can always remove it if people
> don't want the item completed.
The reason this was added is that modular applications expect that a locally
issued BEGIN ... COMMIT executes a transaction, whereas now you don't know
what you're getting. I think this change would have merit.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-01-02 14:19:50
Subject : Re: float8 width_bucket function
Previous :From : Peter EisentrautDate : 2007-01-02 10:50:41
Subject : Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside