Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>,Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet(at)amorsen(dot)dk>
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2007-01-02 10:48:25
Message-ID: 200701021148.27707.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 13:25 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:
> Yes, and I can't think of a single reason why we'd let people specify
> anything in millibytes, or kilobits.

How about a configuration option related to connection throughput, which is 
typically measured in bits?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-02 10:50:41
Subject: Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-02 10:43:53
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group