Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO: GNU TLS

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc,Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2006-12-30 23:27:16
Message-ID: 20061230232716.GF8245@svana.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > much.  This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > licenses.  You're welcome to your own interpretation.
> 
> That was my point --- that it isn't clear what "additional restrictions"
> are, and that an advertizing clause or additional license can be
> interpreted as the same thing.

Somehow I don't think a statement requiring you to put some guys name
in all your advertising material is the same as requiring you to
preserve the copyright notice.

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew HammondDate: 2006-12-30 23:36:24
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-12-30 22:03:23
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group