| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Date: | 2006-12-30 14:36:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20061230143603.GL24675@kenobi.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > given options like --enable-dtrace and --with-libedit-preferred, I don't find
> > this argument compelling...
>
> Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we
> have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development
> process to get it 100% feature-complete. Doing this for another
> library, I am afraid, isn't trivial, unlike the above options.
Uhh, I have no idea where you got the idea that our current OpenSSL
support is anywhere near 100% feature complete for an SSL
implementation. It's certainly not, and we've been over that
previously...
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-12-30 14:41:57 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-30 11:39:16 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |