| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Date: | 2006-12-29 20:00:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20061229200041.GG24675@kenobi.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Joshua D. Drake (jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
> > 4) GNUTLS development seems more active? OpenSSL has been in a frozen/mature
> > state for a while. I don't understand why OpenSSL is still labelled as
> > 0.9.x, which might indicate alpha quality, under heavy development.
> >
> > I don't find the reasons too compelling - but they are points to
> > consider.
>
> 5) GNUTLS does not run well under all of our supported platforms.
While I don't disagree about that, I would like to reiterate that I
wouldn't advocate or even suggest dropping OpenSSL support or removing
OpenSSL as the default.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-12-29 20:28:32 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Roman Kononov | 2006-12-29 19:54:41 | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing |