Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
To: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet(at)amorsen(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-27 09:45:58
Message-ID: 20061227094558.GC15370@www.trapp.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:39:22AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> >>>>> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> TL> Anyone against making it case-insensitive, speak now or hold your
> TL> peace.
>
> SI-units are inherently case-sensitive [...]

As a notorious lurker, set my weight to one mg (choose the case ;-)

I'd tend to keep case sensitivity, but will hold my peace regardless of
outcome.

Thanks
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFkkDWBcgs9XrR2kYRAmKFAJwPMOwl+IbCbMQvszn9RKpXRW3N6ACfbwne
juGsqnMsj2BMyCO+BjP9hq4=
=KCiY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dhanaraj M 2006-12-27 10:02:51 Allow the identifier length to be increased via a configure option
Previous Message Benny Amorsen 2006-12-27 08:39:22 Re: effective_cache_size vs units