Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch

From: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>,"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch
Date: 2006-12-22 02:48:43
Message-ID: 20061222113657.6425.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

> > I consider that smoothing the load (more meaningfully, response time)
> > has higher priority over checkpoint punctuality in a practical sense,
>  
> I agree with that.

I agree with checkpoint_time is not so important, but we should
respect checkpoint_segements, or else new WAL files would be
created unboundedly, as Bruce pointed.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2006-12-22 03:12:35
Subject: Re: Stats Collector Oddity
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-22 02:28:58
Subject: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2006-12-22 03:19:49
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-22 02:28:58
Subject: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group