Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] 8.2.0 pdf
Date: 2006-12-15 01:22:03
Message-ID: 200612150122.kBF1M3Y07057@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patchespgsql-www
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Jim Nasby wrote:
> >> Also, if PDF indexes depend on HTML, perhaps HTML should be a
> >> dependency of PDF in the Makefile.
> 
> > By that logic, HTML should also depend on HTML.  I don't know how people 
> > would like that.
> 
> The real point is that the "jade" step needs to be done twice to have
> up-to-date indexes.  It makes sense not to force that for html, because
> we use html for proofing.  But perhaps we ought to run jade twice in the
> Makefile rule for producing pdftex output?  I see that the Makefile
> forces three runs of TeX for similar reasons (which is probably way more
> time than the jade part anyway).

I have modified the sgml Makefile to run jade twice for PDF and PS
output;  patch attached and applied to HEAD and 8.2.X.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment: /rtmp/diff
Description: text/x-diff (1.8 KB)

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-12-15 02:45:52
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2006-12-14 21:37:01
Subject: Re: Authoring Tools WAS: Switching to XML

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2006-12-15 05:11:35
Subject: Re: [webmaster]
Previous:From: Richard Broersma JrDate: 2006-12-14 18:44:11
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Subcribing to this list, what's the

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-12-15 03:19:36
Subject: Re: Updated XML patch
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-12-14 23:26:56
Subject: Re: timing for \copy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group