Re: Incrementing INET fields

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Incrementing INET fields
Date: 2006-11-27 14:42:01
Message-ID: 20061127144201.GD20371@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 03:04:01PM +0200, Peter Nixonn wrote:
> Is there some technical reason (other than finite developer time) that this
> isn't possible at present?

I don't think it makes much sense, without a fair amount of policy
around it. For instance, you'd need to know what to increment to
when you get to 10.1.1.254/32. Moreover, the mask range work you
mentioned as "icing on the cake" is not icing at all: it's part of
the cake, becase CIDR has been here for a long time. So you _have_
to be able to know what range you're in in order to do autoincrement.

You could write a function that would do all this for you, though.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-11-27 14:45:59 Re: Potential to_char localization bug
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-11-27 14:35:32 Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues