On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:13:26PM -0700, Brian Wipf wrote:
> It certainly is unfortunate if Guido's right and this is an upper
> limit for OS X. The performance benefit of having high shared_buffers
> on our mostly read database is remarkable.
Got any data about that you can share? People have been wondering about
cases where drastically increasing shared_buffers makes a difference.
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2006-11-26 23:30:56|
|Subject: Re: availability of SATA vendors|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2006-11-26 17:47:38|
|Subject: Re: When to vacuum a table?|